Http Benchmark



  • Benchmark Education provides solutions to help educate all kinds of students: gifted, on-level, and struggling readers, students with learning disabilities, and those still mastering English as a.
  • The Computer Language Benchmarks Game Which programming language is fastest? Which programs are fastest? Our results show that real web applications behave very differently from the benchmarks. Too hard, let's go measure benchmark programs!
  1. Benchmark Marketing Agency
  2. Benchmark.com
  3. Http Benchmark Tool
  4. Benchmark
  5. Http Benchmark Golang

Identification Number: Verification Number: IT: 1-877-319-9669, Option 5. Benchmark has a suite of tools designed to keep up with your drive, including contact management. Expanding your business Take full advantage of Benchmark’s capabilities by upgrading to Pro and see just how much using the right tools can impact your company’s growth.

Requirements summary

In this test, each request is processed by fetching a single row from a simple database table. That row is then serialized as a JSON response.

Benchmark Analytics needs JavaScript enabled to function. Benchmark Analytics. Benchmark Analytics needs JavaScript enabled to function.

Example response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 32 Content-Type: application/json Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT {'id':3217,'randomNumber':2149}

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Requirements summary

In this test, each request is processed by fetching multiple rows from a simple database table and serializing these rows as a JSON response. The test is run multiple times: testing 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 queries per request. All tests are run at 512 concurrency.

Example response for 10 queries:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 315 Content-Type: application/json Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT [{'id':4174,'randomNumber':331},{'id':51,'randomNumber':6544},{'id':4462,'randomNumber':952},{'id':2221,'randomNumber':532},{'id':9276,'randomNumber':3097},{'id':3056,'randomNumber':7293},{'id':6964,'randomNumber':620},{'id':675,'randomNumber':6601},{'id':8414,'randomNumber':6569},{'id':2753,'randomNumber':4065}]

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Benchmark Marketing Agency

Requirements summary

In this test, each request is processed by fetching multiple cached objects from an in-memory database (the cache having been populated from a database table either as needed or prior to testing) and serializing these objects as a JSON response. The test is run multiple times: testing 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 cached object fetches per request. All tests are run at 512 concurrency. Conceptually, this is similar to the multiple-queries test except that it uses a caching layer.

Example response for 10 object fetches:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 315 Content-Type: application/json Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT [{'id':4174,'randomNumber':331},{'id':51,'randomNumber':6544},{'id':4462,'randomNumber':952},{'id':2221,'randomNumber':532},{'id':9276,'randomNumber':3097},{'id':3056,'randomNumber':7293},{'id':6964,'randomNumber':620},{'id':675,'randomNumber':6601},{'id':8414,'randomNumber':6569},{'id':2753,'randomNumber':4065}]

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Requirements summary

This test exercises database writes. Each request is processed by fetching multiple rows from a simple database table, converting the rows to in-memory objects, modifying one attribute of each object in memory, updating each associated row in the database individually, and then serializing the list of objects as a JSON response. The test is run multiple times: testing 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 updates per request. Note that the number of statements per request is twice the number of updates since each update is paired with one query to fetch the object. All tests are run at 512 concurrency.

The response is analogous to the multiple-query test. Example response for 10 updates:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 315 Content-Type: application/json Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT [{'id':4174,'randomNumber':331},{'id':51,'randomNumber':6544},{'id':4462,'randomNumber':952},{'id':2221,'randomNumber':532},{'id':9276,'randomNumber':3097},{'id':3056,'randomNumber':7293},{'id':6964,'randomNumber':620},{'id':675,'randomNumber':6601},{'id':8414,'randomNumber':6569},{'id':2753,'randomNumber':4065}]

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Requirements summary

In this test, the framework's ORM is used to fetch all rows from a database table containing an unknown number of Unix fortune cookie messages (the table has 12 rows, but the code cannot have foreknowledge of the table's size). An additional fortune cookie message is inserted into the list at runtime and then the list is sorted by the message text. Finally, the list is delivered to the client using a server-side HTML template. The message text must be considered untrusted and properly escaped and the UTF-8 fortune messages must be rendered properly.

Whitespace is optional and may comply with the framework's best practices.

Example response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 1196 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT <!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title>Fortunes</title></head><body><table><tr><th>id</th><th>message</th></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>&lt;script&gt;alert(&quot;This should not be displayed in a browser alert box.&quot;);&lt;/script&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>A bad random number generator: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4.33e+67, 1, 1, 1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>A computer program does what you tell it to do, not what you want it to do.</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>A computer scientist is someone who fixes things that aren&apos;t broken.</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>A list is only as strong as its weakest link. — Donald Knuth</td></tr><tr><td>0</td><td>Additional fortune added at request time.</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>After enough decimal places, nobody gives a damn.</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>Any program that runs right is obsolete.</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>Emacs is a nice operating system, but I prefer UNIX. — Tom Christaensen</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>Feature: A bug with seniority.</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>fortune: No such file or directory</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>フレームワークのベンチマーク</td></tr></table></body></html>Wayne

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Requirements summary

In this test, each response is a JSON serialization of a freshly-instantiated object that maps the key message to the value Hello, World!

Example response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 28 Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT {'message':'Hello, World!'}

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Requirements summary

In this test, the framework responds with the simplest of responses: a 'Hello, World' message rendered as plain text. The size of the response is kept small so that gigabit Ethernet is not the limiting factor for all implementations. HTTP pipelining is enabled and higher client-side concurrency levels are used for this test (see the 'Data table' view).

Example response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Server: Example Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:00:00 GMT Hello, World!

For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.

Frameworks and test implementations change over time, and our composite score weights are only computed for official rounds (e.g., '). For the composite scoring shown below to be meaningful, results should be gathered using implementation versions that correspond with the most recent official Round.
The test implementations from Round 18 are at commit ID 12b68023e5d406680af745d34b2984741bc7c198 .
The results rendered here were generated using commit ID . Although this is a mismatch, the composite weights for are used below as a placeholder.
--
BenchmarkBenchmark
Score unavailable
TechEmpower Performance Rating (TPR-3)
TPR-3 is a composite hardware environment score for a three-machine configuration, derived from all test types for TPR-tagged frameworks. (More about TPR frameworks and TPR-1 versus TPR-3)
Environment scores are only available for rounds or ad-hoc runs that include the full suite of TPR-tagged frameworks. If any TPR-tagged frameworks are missing from a run, we aren't able to compute a fair environment score. This run is missing the following TPR-tagged frameworks:
FrameworkTests Missing
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Each framework's peak performance in each test type (shown in the colored columns below) is multiplied by the weights shown above. The results are then summed to yield a weighted score. Only frameworks that implement all test types are included.

Frameworks flagged with a icon are part of the TechEmpower Performance Rating (TPR) measurement for hardware environments. The TPR rating for a hardware environment is visible on the Composite scores tab, if available.

If you have any comments about this round, please post at the Framework Benchmarks GitHub Discussion.

Features · Getting started · Documentation · Learn more about benchmarking

Benchmark.com

BenchmarkDotNet helps you to transform methods into benchmarks, track their performance, and share reproducible measurement experiments.It's no harder than writing unit tests!Under the hood, it performs a lot of magic that guarantees reliable and precise results thanks to the perfolizer statistical engine.BenchmarkDotNet protects you from popular benchmarking mistakes and warns you if something is wrong with your benchmark design or obtained measurements.The results are presented in a user-friendly form that highlights all the important facts about your experiment.The library is adopted by 3800+ projects including .NET Runtime and supported by the .NET Foundation.

It's easy to start writing benchmarks, check out an example(copy-pastable version is here):

BenchmarkDotNet automaticallyruns the benchmarks on all the runtimes,aggregates the measurements,and prints a summary table with the most important information:

The measured data can be exported to different formats (md, html, csv, xml, json, etc.) including plots:

Supported runtimes: .NET 5+, .NET Framework 4.6.1+, .NET Core 2.0+, Mono, CoreRT
Supported languages: C#, F#, Visual Basic
Supported OS: Windows, Linux, macOS

Features

Benchmark

BenchmarkDotNet has tons of features that are essential in comprehensive performance investigations.Four aspects define the design of these features:simplicity, automation, reliability, and friendliness.

Simplicity

You shouldn't be an experience performance engineer if you want to write benchmarks.You can design very complicated performance experiments in the declarative style using simple APIs.

For example, if you want to parameterize your benchmark,mark a field or a property with [Params(1, 2, 3)]: BenchmarkDotNet will enumerate all of the specified valuesand run benchmarks for each case.If you want to compare benchmarks with each other,mark one of the benchmark as the baselinevia [Benchmark(baseline: true)]: BenchmarkDotNet will compare it with all of the other benchmarks.If you want to compare performance in different environments, use jobs.For example, you can run all the benchmarks on .NET Core 3.0 and Mono via[SimpleJob(RuntimeMoniker.NetCoreApp30)] and [SimpleJob(RuntimeMoniker.Mono)].

If you don't like attributes, you can call most of the APIs via the fluent style and write code like this:

If you prefer command-line experience, you can configure your benchmarks viathe console argumentsin any console application or use.NET Core command-line toolto run benchmarks from any dll:

Automation

Reliable benchmarks always include a lot of boilerplate code.

Let's think about what should you do in a typical case.First, you should perform a pilot experiment and determine the best number of method invocations.Next, you should execute several warm-up iterations and ensure that your benchmark achieved a steady state.After that, you should execute the main iterations and calculate some basic statistics.If you calculate some values in your benchmark, you should use it somehow to prevent the dead code elimination.If you use loops, you should care about an effect of the loop unrolling on your results(which may depend on the processor architecture).Once you get results, you should check for some special properties of the obtained performance distributionlike multimodality or extremely high outliers.You should also evaluate the overhead of your infrastructure and deduct it from your results.If you want to test several environments, you should perform the measurements in each of them and manually aggregate the results.

If you write this code from scratch, it's easy to make a mistake and spoil your measurements.Note that it's a shortened version of the full checklist that you should follow during benchmarking:there are a lot of additional hidden pitfalls that should be handled appropriately.Fortunately, you shouldn't worry about it becauseBenchmarkDotNet will do this boring and time-consuming stuff for you.

Moreover, the library can help you with some advanced tasks that you may want to perform during the investigation.For example,BenchmarkDotNet can measure the managed andnative memory trafficand print disassembly listings for your benchmarks.

Reliability

A lot of hand-written benchmarks produce wrong numbers that lead to incorrect business decisions.BenchmarkDotNet protects you from most of the benchmarking pitfalls and allows achieving high measurement precision.

You shouldn't worry about the perfect number of method invocation, the number of warm-up and actual iterations:BenchmarkDotNet tries to choose the best benchmarking parameters andachieve a good trade-off between the measurement prevision and the total duration of all benchmark runs.So, you shouldn't use any magic numbers (like 'We should perform 100 iterations here'),the library will do it for you based on the values of statistical metrics.

BenchmarkDotNet also prevents benchmarking of non-optimized assemblies that was built using DEBUG mode becausethe corresponding results will be unreliable.It will print a warning you if you have an attached debugger,if you use hypervisor (HyperV, VMware, VirtualBox),or if you have any other problems with the current environment.

During 6+ years of development, we faced dozens of different problems that may spoil your measurements.Inside BenchmarkDotNet, there are a lot of heuristics, checks, hacks, and tricks that help you toincrease the reliability of the results.

Friendliness

Analysis of performance data is a time-consuming activity that requires attentiveness, knowledge, and experience.BenchmarkDotNet performs the main part of this analysis for you and presents results in a user-friendly form.

After the experiments, you get a summary table that contains a lot of useful data about the executed benchmarks.By default, it includes only the most important columns,but they can be easily customized.The column set is adaptive and depends on the benchmark definition and measured values.For example, if you mark one of the benchmarks as a baseline,you will get additional columns that will help you to compare all the benchmarks with the baseline.By default, it always shows the Mean column,but if we detected a vast difference between the Mean and the Median values,both columns will be presented.

BenchmarkDotNet tries to find some unusual properties of your performance distributions and prints nice messages about it.For example, it will warn you in case of multimodal distribution or high outliers.In this case, you can scroll the results up and check out ASCII-style histograms for each distributionor generate beautiful png plots using [RPlotExporter].

Http Benchmark Tool

BenchmarkDotNet doesn't overload you with data; it shows only the essential information depending on your results:it allows you to keep summary small for primitive cases and extend it only for the complicated cases.Of course, you can request any additional statistics and visualizations manually.If you don't customize the summary view,the default presentation will be as much user-friendly as possible. :)

Who use BenchmarkDotNet?

Everyone!BenchmarkDotNet is already adopted by more than 3800+ projects includingdotnet/performance (reference benchmarks for all .NET Runtimes),dotnet/runtime (.NET Core runtime and libraries),Roslyn (C# and Visual Basic compiler),Mono,ASP.NET Core,ML.NET,Entity Framework Core,SignalR,F#,Orleans,Newtonsoft.Json,Elasticsearch.Net,Dapper,Expecto,Accord.NET,ImageSharp,RavenDB,NodaTime,Jint,NServiceBus,Serilog,Autofac,Npgsql,Avalonia,ReactiveUI,SharpZipLib,LiteDB,GraphQL for .NET,MediatR,TensorFlow.NET,Apache Thrift.
On GitHub, you can find3000+ issues,1800+ commits, and500,000+ filesthat involve BenchmarkDotNet.

Learn more about benchmarking

Benchmark

BenchmarkDotNet is not a silver bullet that magically makes all of your benchmarks correct and analyzes the measurements for you.Even if you use this library, you still should know how to design the benchmark experiments and how to make correct conclusions based on the raw data.If you want to know more about benchmarking methodology and good practices,it's recommended to read a book by Andrey Akinshin (the BenchmarkDotNet project lead): 'Pro .NET Benchmarking'.Use this in-depth guide to correctly design benchmarks, measure key performance metrics of .NET applications, and analyze results.This book presents dozens of case studies to help you understand complicated benchmarking topics.You will avoid common pitfalls, control the accuracy of your measurements, and improve the performance of your software.

Build status

Build serverPlatformBuild status
Azure PipelinesWindows
Azure PipelinesUbuntu
Azure PipelinesmacOS
AppVeyorWindows
TravisLinux
TravismacOS

Http Benchmark Golang

Contributions are welcome!

BenchmarkDotNet is already a stable full-featured library that allows performing performance investigation on a professional level.And it continues to evolve!We add new features all the time, but we have too many new cool ideas.Any help will be appreciated.You can develop new features, fix bugs, improve the documentation, or do some other cool stuff.

If you want to contribute, check out theContributing guide andup-for-grabs issues.If you have new ideas or want to complain about bugs, feel free to create a new issue.Let's build the best tool for benchmarking together!

Code of Conduct

This project has adopted the code of conduct defined by the Contributor Covenantto clarify expected behavior in our community.For more information, see the .NET Foundation Code of Conduct.